Drug use and crime relationship to law

drug use and crime relationship to law

Drug law violations and other crimes related to substance abuse incur dire costs in terms of both financial outlay and human suffering. This review of the curre. Drug abuse and crime--Caribbean Area--Statistics. 2. .. Fortuna Belrose, Deputy Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Legal Affairs, Homeland Affairs and National. A. Link Between the Legal Status of Certain Drugs and Crime The statistical relationship between illegal drug use and crime is convincing at first glance, but it .

A larger offending increase was associated with opiate initiation in female, compared to male, users. Conclusions For most crime categories, the difference between groups is exacerbated by opiate initiation.

The findings indicate that opiate prevention initiatives might be effective in reducing offending, particularly among females. Offending, Opiate use, Life-course offending 1. Introduction Those dependent on heroin, and other opiates, are disproportionately involved in criminal activity Bennett et al.

The drugs-crime association is an important driver of UK policy, reflected in its prominence in the drug strategies of successive governments HM Government,Home Office, Explanations of this association fall into three groups: Forward causation — drug use causes crime either through the need to: Reverse causation — involvement with crime leads to drug use: Confounding — crime and drug use share a common set of cause s: The underlying causal mechanism s is likely to be more complex than these explanations suggest Bennett and Holloway,Seddon, Our previous work has highlighted the need for longitudinal studies with a non-drug user comparison group to examine the natural history of drug use and offending Hayhurst et al.

Current evidence about the development of drug use and offending is constrained by design flaws in published studies, particularly the absence of suitable control groups. Our recent review of the evidence base on pathways through opiate use and offending Hayhurst et al.

Illegal Drug Use and Crime: A Complex Relationship

A typical example is the study by Anglin and Speckartwhich examined the criminal records and clinical data of male methadone patients. Most studies which make this comparison find that offending rates are substantially higher after drug-use initiation Hayhurst et al. In general population samples, offending rates tend to peak during late adolescence Sweeten et al. To disentangle the age effects from those of drug-use initiation, it is crucial to control for age, using an appropriate control group.

This paper reports a retrospective cohort analysis to compare the historical offending trajectory of offenders according to drug test result. Prior analysis on this cohort considered offending rates in the two years prior to drug-test and found that testing positive for opiates was a greater predictor of excess offending than testing positive for cocaine.

drug use and crime relationship to law

We therefore focus on opiate use, by comparing the historical offending trajectory of offenders who test positive for opiate use opiate positives with a control group who test negative for both opiate and cocaine use test-negatives. This comparison is performed for all offences committed and for three offence categories serious acquisitive, non-serious acquisitive, violent whilst controlling for age and birth cohort, and separately by gender.

Information about the age of first opiate use is used to consider whether the contrast between opiate positives and test-negatives is similar both before, and after, the initiation of opiate use.

The following hypotheses are considered: The initiation of opiate use exacerbates the level of offending compared to negative testers; 3. The effect of opiate-use initiation is different for males and females.

The effect of opiate-use initiation differs by crime type. Data The analysis cohort was identified from those who received a saliva drug test for opiate and cocaine metabolites following arrest, as recorded by the Drug Test Record DTRover the period 1st April to 31st March This cohort has been described in detail elsewhere Pierce et al.

The age range restriction was applied since the profile of individuals whose offending persists into their 40s may be atypical Moffitt,Moffitt and Caspi, From the analysis cohort, we define opiate-positive cases as those who, on arrest, tested positive for opiates and negative tester controls as those who tested negative for opiates and cocaine. Data are retained on positive and negative saliva test results, test dates, reason for test and basic demographic information.

Those who test positive are required to attend an initial assessment with a drugs worker who will help the user seek treatment and other support. We consider the subset which resulted in a conviction or a caution, reprimand or warning i. All sanctioned offences committed by the individual were included, from age 10 the age of criminal liability in England up to the two weeks prior to the drug test. Moreover, police do not necessarily investigate incidents reported to them.

Drug War Alternatives That Work • Overcriminalized: Substance Abuse • BRAVE NEW FILMS: JUSTICE

It is not enough for police authorities to be aware of the incident; officers on duty must establish that the situation in question is a criminal justice matter. Briefly put, the police can choose various interpretations and actions; these can include: For example, there is every reason to believe that the sharp decline in the number of drug-related offences observed in Canada between and may be explained in part by the introduction of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in By restricting police search and seizure powers, the Charter appreciably reduced the number of police actions related to drug possession.

Similarly, the introduction of alternative measures in that police officers could use when dealing with adult offenders instead of laying formal charges appears to have had a downward effect on the number of charges laid by police. Foreign data Statistics similar to those gathered in Canada on crime related to drug use, trafficking and the production of illegal drugs are published the world over.

Inmarijuana was the substance most commonly cited in drug-related arrests in member states of the European Union. The caution regarding the reliability of the Canadian statistics stated above also applies to foreign data.

According to some studies in France, statistics on arrests of drug users must be used with caution, as it is difficult to determine with any certainty the extent to which observed changes reflect changes in the drug user population and whether the changes are in fact linked to changes in police and gendarmerie activities.

The link between drugs and crime highlighted in this section pertains directly to drug use and drug possession. Trafficking in, importing and producing illegal drugs are forms of crime driven by different motives, such as the need to get money to buy drugs to satisfy a drug addiction. Psychopharmacological link Many people associate drug intoxication with crime, sometimes even violent crime.

Inversely, heroin and cannabis are generally associated with a weaker desire to use violence to resolve disputes. Heroin Like marijuana, heroin generally has the effect of lowering the desire to use violence. In some cases, however, it appears that disturbed or impulsive behaviours may occur during a period of withdrawal. Cocaine abuse can cause paranoia, although that reaction appears to be infrequent among cocaine users as a whole. Some report that cocaine use can also cause irritability and anxiety in users, especially at the end of a period of intoxication.

Like cocaine, it stimulates the central nervous system. Empirical studies are particularly incomplete for this drug; however, PCP is second to alcohol as the drug most often associated with violence.

It can therefore cause strange and violent behaviour.

Amphetamines The main property of amphetamines is that, like cocaine, they stimulate the central nervous system. Amphetamine abuse can thus cause paranoia, irritability, anxiety and even toxic psychosis.

Legal and Illegal Drugs in Canada, Toronto: Key Porter Books, However, evidence supporting this model is limited. The few empirical elements are drawn from research which presents numerous methodological problems and does not really help to understand the specific effects of certain drugs.

The following paragraphs present research findings which show that many criminal acts, some of them violent, are committed in Canada each year under the influence of a drug. There was a rather clear distinction between acquisitory crimes and violent crimes in the prevalence of use of drugs and alcohol. While homicides and, more pronouncedly, assaults and wounding were predominantly alcohol-related, crimes such as thefts and break and enter showed a higher prevalence of drug use on the day of the crime.

Drug-related crime

The study, which dealt specifically with illegal drug use and crime, produced the following main findings: In other words, nothing in these findings clearly demonstrates that the criminal act would not have been committed if the individual had not been under the influence of drugs.

Moreover, the findings based on the link that the offender sees between his or her drug use and his or her crimes should be significantly clarified. In the view of various researchers, [47] some inmates prefer to associate their criminal behaviour with their drug use. This enables them to attribute responsibility for their actions to an outside cause, i.

Although for many inmates this association is indisputable, research has shown that some individuals use it as an excuse for their behaviour and to unburden themselves of part of the weight of the offence. According to the survey results, three-quarters of respondents admitted that drinking could serve as a pretext for using violence. This deficiency forces a recognition of the fact that the reasons for violence and criminal activity go beyond the properties of the drugs themselves.

Although many studies indicate that some people used illegal drugs the day they committed their crime, there is little empirical evidence in the scientific literature to establish a direct link between crime, violence and the psychopharmacological effects of drugs. Substance abuse and criminal activity Before moving on to crime and violence caused by the illegal drug market, this section examines another aspect that may explain the link between drug use and crime, i.

More specifically, according to this explanatory model of the drug-crime relationship, the compelling and recurrent need for drugs and their high price lead some users to commit crimes to obtain the money they need to buy drugs.

This model focuses on individuals who have developed a dependence on expensive drugs and assumes that the large amounts of money associated with frequent use of certain illegal drugs constitute an incentive for criminal action.

This explanation of the relationship between drugs and crime is well supported in the literature and the media. Many people attribute a great percentage of crime to this economic-compulsive link.

The offenders themselves promote this association by swearing to anyone who will listen that the single cause of their involvement in crime is their heavy [drug] use.

drug use and crime relationship to law

For many, this statement is indisputable. For others, some doubt persists because, in some instances, there is a clear benefit to be gained in accepting the label of addict: Some Canadian and foreign studies have shown that the rate of use of illegal drugs is much higher among people who have been in contact with the criminal justice system than among the general population.

According to one study conducted by Forget in[59] more than one-third of the individuals interviewed at the Montreal Detention Centre said that they had committed their crimes for the purpose of buying drugs. Similarly, the study by Brochu et al. That was the case for inmates who had committed the following crimes: The study also appears to confirm a strong link between the use of expensive drugs and the commission of criminal acts.

As discussed above, some offenders consciously or not use this strategy to justify their behaviour and reject responsibility for their actions.