6 ways QA engineers can work better with developers
And QA sees development as a bunch of cowboys who would ship just about anything And QA engineers sincerely want to help the company ship good software. set up a functional, congruent relationship between QA and development. The relationship between developers and QA engineers is often a but including specific test steps also help QA engineers focus on the most. A developer:QA ratio of will mean a different role when compared to a ratio of Take this into account. Volunteer to help testers out with.
Bugs would flow back upstream until the software had reached the level of quality that was expected. The traditional waterfall model How Agile changes things Many software development organizations practicing Agile methodologies still try to operate in this fashion. It is common to see software development teams staggering iterations so that the developers will work on writing code for one iteration while the QA team is testing the code from the previous iteration. This kind of methodology is not really Agile, it is mini-waterfall.
When organizations are developing code in this manner, they are simply taking the waterfall process and chopping it up into smaller segments. They are getting all the pain of the waterfall process and missing many of the benefits of Agile. To truly operate in an Agile environment, entire organizations need to be Agile. Sure, that is easy to say, but what does that actually mean? It means that organizations need to be able to respond to change quickly and to iterate their software in response to that change.
Here is an example that will make things a bit more clear Staggered iterations mini-waterfall Suppose a team is developing a feature for call center software that allows a customer representative to provide detailed notes about a call to their supervisor for review each week.
The software developer on that team's project writes the code for that feature during the current iteration, while the QA team is happily testing the features the development team had completed last week.
The development team finishes the feature and in the next iteration, they move on to another feature and hand the call notes feature over to QA to test. Well, it just so happens that when the QA team starts testing the feature, the customer who is going to use the software tries it out as well and discovers that they actually want the feature implemented in a completely different way.
Obviously, at this point it doesn't make sense for QA to continue testing the feature, so they stop.
But now, the developers are already working on something else, so they either have to stop what they are doing and start working on the call notes feature again, or they have to put off the changes to the feature for the next iteration. Even if they manage to complete the requested changes to the feature in their current iteration, it will be a whole other iteration before the feature is tested.
Getting QA and Developers to Work Together | Zephyr
How working together makes you more agile So, following an Agile process alone does not make one agile. In order to really be agile, in the true sense of the word, meaning an organizations can respond to change rapidly, they need to have their QA and development teams working together each iteration. Instead of developers completing code and throwing it over the wall to be tested in the next iteration, a truly Agile team will have developer and QA team members work together during the current sprint to both develop and test a feature.
By doing this, a team is able to respond to any changes immediately and is truly able to iterate the development of their software.
QA and Development
Going back to the example with the call center software. It can be seen that if the QA team was testing the call note feature in the same iteration that the developers were developing it, making changes midstream would be a much easier task. The developers could simply make modifications to the feature and give those modifications directly to QA in the same iteration.
No time would be lost waiting for the feature to make it completely through the pipeline.
Building Better Relationships Between Developers and QA | TestCraft
Development and testing in the same iteration How to create a unified team Of course this is all easier said than done. How can a team develop and test a feature in the same iteration? Doesn't the feature need to be developed before it can be tested? If a team looks at a feature as an atomic element that can't be broken up into smaller parts, then yes, it does.
5 Ways To Improve Collaboration Between Software Testers And Developers
But, most features are not unbreakable stones. Most features can be broken up into smaller pebbles which can be developed and tested independently of the whole.Strengthening QA and Developer Relations in Agile Contexts
To look at features and develop them this way requires coordination and communication between the developers and QA analysts. When a new feature is going to be worked on in an iteration, the development team needs to meet with the QA team together to talk about exactly how the feature is going to be broken up and what exactly is going to be tested.
The term test driven development, or TDD is used to describe the practice of writing failing unit tests before writing code in a software project. This same idea can be applied at a higher level to the development and testing of an actual feature to allow the tests to drive the development of that feature.
In this scenario the development and QA teams meet together and the first thing that is decided upon is the high level tests that will be used to verify the correctness of the feature. Developers and QA analysts work together to define, at a high level, what test will be run and created to test the feature.
Developers then start writing the code that will be necessary to make those tests pass, one test at a time. Each time the development team has enough code created to make a test pass, that code is handed over to QA to execute that test against the code for the feature.
One by one, the code required to make each test pass is written and tested and little by little over the course of the iteration the feature is both developed and tested at the same time. This process of developing features one test at a time requires the entire team to work together as a single unit to complete the work for a sprint.
It requires developers to understand more about the testing process, since they will need to know how the features they are developing will be tested. It requires the QA analysts to know more about the development process, since they will need to be aware of when certain parts of a feature are ready for testing.
Inevitably, when bugs are found using this process, they are handled immediately. When QA member finds a bug, it indicates that a particular test that a developer thought should pass, does not pass. Work doesn't move forward until the failing test passes, so bugs are always fixed as the software is developed, not after. At least not bugs that are found by normal testing. Metrics and Dashboards Most Agile teams use either a burndown chart or a wallboard with different lanes to show the progress of items being worked on and to let the team know what the priority of work is.
These tools can be an important part of getting development and QA teams to work together Having a central location where team members are able to see priorities and the progress of work being done during the iteration, helps the team to have a unified goal and to visualize how work will progress during the iteration.
When adapting a truly Agile process, as suggested in this paper, many teams struggle with a huge backlog of QA work being pushed to the end of the iteration. Creating a foundation of trust, collaboration, and communication is vital to team morale and a positive working environment. Build trust through better communication Improved communication goes a long way towards building a foundation of trust between developers and QA engineers, and pull requests PR are a great place to start.
That way the sections you need are automatically laid out, and the developer just has to fill in the relevant information.
The link for the ticket is just a nice bit for your QA engineer, so the ticket info is easily at hand for them. Most acceptance testing or feature testing involves exploratory testing as well, but including specific test steps also help QA engineers focus on the most relevant changes.
People often have a negativity biasso being mindful of the type of feedback you give — or are perceived to give — is especially important.
When developers and QA engineers create a pattern of positive communication, it sets a foundation for how they interact with each other and enhances your working relationships.
Understand your QA team QA engineers often end up with a very hybrid role, which means they get a variety of experiences with different teams or companies. For instance, some people excel at detailed exploratory testing, while others may be skilled at setting up and troubleshooting continuous delivery pipelines.
Do they come from a programming background? Do they have experience with performance testing or security? Do they enjoy process creation and focusing on improving developer experience?